Has anyone been following the results of the Iraq Study Group? I just listened to about ten minutes of the press conference on BBC World Report (via NPR). A three point summary of the report might look like this:
1) A new objective for American forces is required, one which will allow the United States to disengage and bring home the vast majority of its combat forces. A near-complete withdraw should be possible by the first quarter of 2008.
2) A new political consensus is required, both at home and abroad. Abroad, neighboring countries, namely Syria and Iran, must be brought in to cooperate, as the stability of Iraq requires participation in its greater area.
3) The Iraqi government must be given specific goals to adhere to, and the threat of losing their foreign aid if they fail to meet the goals in time.
Some other quotes I remember from former Sec. of State James Baker, which I'm sure I have probably remembered off by a word or two:
[Escalation would bring about a crippling regional battle. Immediate withdrawl would bring a "bloodbath".] "...and our recomended course of action is not without its own shortcomings."
"The Iraqis have found it impossible to dream... they have gone from a horrific tyrannical order to the fear of extreme violence."
"To enact these new changes, a great amount of political fortitude is required."
"The executive branch and legislative branch need to work together."
"Events in Iraq may change the correct course of action in Iraq. As such, the military leadership must act urgently."
Edition.cnn.com quotes the word "Grave" from the report - as if one word can sum up the entire thing - but I have to say that from the press conference, the Study Group had a more positive outlook than what the media outlets have been trying to cast. Things aren't peaches and creme, but it seems as though Baker et al. are not carrying a doomsday message.
Anyone else have observations in relation to the report? How much weight will it hold? Any?
I hope so.